On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:10:38PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > > > > > > > And we should be careful to handle the multiple reply queue case, given the queue > > > shouldn't be stopped or quieseced because other reply queues are still active. > > > > > > The new CPUHP state for blk-mq should be invoked after the to-be-offline > > > CPU is quiesced and before it becomes offline. > > > > Hi John, > > > > Hi Ming, > > > Thinking of this issue further, so far, one doable solution is to > > expose reply queues > > as blk-mq hw queues, as done by the following patchset: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20180205152035.15016-1-ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > I thought that this patchset had fundamental issues, in terms of working for > all types of hosts. FYI, I did the backport of latest hisi_sas_v3 to v4.15 Could you explain it a bit about the fundamental issues for all types of host? It is just for hosts with multiple reply queues, such as hisi_sas v3, megaraid_sas, mpt3sas and hpsa. > with this patchset (as you may have noticed in my git send mistake), but we > have not got to test it yet. > > On a related topic, we did test exposing reply queues as blk-mq hw queues > and generating the host-wide tag internally in the LLDD with sbitmap, and > unfortunately we were experiencing a significant performance hit, like 2300K > -> 1800K IOPs for 4K read. > > We need to test this further. I don't understand why we get such a big hit. The performance regression shouldn't have been introduced in theory, and it is because blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() iterates over the same duplicated tags multiple times, which can be fixed easily. > > > > > In which global host-wide tags are shared for all blk-mq hw queues. > > > > Also we can remove all the reply_map stuff in drivers, then solve the problem of > > draining in-flight requests during unplugging CPU in a generic approach. > > So you're saying that removing this reply queue stuff can make the solution > to the problem more generic, but do you have an idea of the overall > solution? 1) convert reply queue into blk-mq hw queue first 2) then all drivers are in same position wrt. handling requests vs. unplugging CPU (shutdown managed IRQ) The current handling in blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead() is actually wrong, at that time, all CPUs on the hctx are dead, blk_mq_run_hw_queue() still dispatches requests on driver's hw queue, and driver is invisible to DEAD CPUs mapped to this hctx, and finally interrupt for these requests on the hctx are lost. Frankly speaking, the above 2nd problem is still hard to solve. 1) take_cpu_down() shutdown managed IRQ first, then run teardown callback for states in [CPUHP_AP_ONLINE, CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE) on the to-be-offline CPU 2) However, all runnable tasks are removed from the CPU in the teardown callback for CPUHP_AP_SCHED_STARTING, which is run after managed IRQs are shutdown. That said it is hard to avoid new request queued to the hctx with all DEAD CPUs. 3) we don't support to freeze queue for specific hctx yet, or that way may not be accepted because of extra cost in fast path 4) once request is allocated, it should be submitted to driver no matter if CPU hotplug happens or not. Or free it and re-allocate new request on proper sw/hw queue? > > > > > Last time, it was reported that the patchset causes performance regression, > > which is actually caused by duplicated io accounting in > > blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(), > > which should be fixed easily. > > > > What do you think of this approach? > > It would still be good to have a forward port of this patchset for testing, > if we're serious about it. Or at least this bug you mention fixed. I plan to make this patchset workable on 5.2-rc for your test first. Thanks, Ming
