On 05/05/2019 04:34, James Bottomley wrote: > On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 17:40 +0100, Colin King wrote: >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Currently the shift of int value 1 by more than 31 places can result >> in undefined behaviour. Fix this by making the 1 a ULL value before >> the shift operation. > > Fusion SAS is pretty ancient. I thought the largest one ever produced > had four phys, so how did you produce the overflow? This was an issue found by static analysis with Coverity; so I guess won't happen in the wild, in which case the patch could be ignored. Colin > > James >
