Hi Satya,
+Cc f2fs mailing list.
On 2019/5/7 6:35, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 9727944139f2..7ac6768a52a5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -279,9 +279,18 @@ static struct bio *__bio_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blk_addr,
> return bio;
> }
>
> +static inline u64 hw_crypt_dun(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> +{
> + return (((u64)inode->i_ino) << 32) | (page->index & 0xFFFFFFFF);
> +}
> +
> static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct bio *bio, enum page_type type)
> {
> + struct page *page;
> + struct inode *inode;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> if (!is_read_io(bio_op(bio))) {
> unsigned int start;
>
> @@ -323,7 +332,21 @@ static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> trace_f2fs_submit_read_bio(sbi->sb, type, bio);
> else
> trace_f2fs_submit_write_bio(sbi->sb, type, bio);
> - submit_bio(bio);
> +
> + if (bio_has_data(bio)) {
> + page = bio_page(bio);
> + if (page && page->mapping && page->mapping->host) {
> + inode = page->mapping->host;
> + err = fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(inode, bio,
Should sanity check in fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx() be necessary? as we have
already did the check in fscrypt_get_encryption_info().
If it's not necessary, we can relax to not care about the error handling.
> + hw_crypt_dun(inode, page));
> + }
> + }
> + if (err) {
> + bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> + bio_endio(bio);
> + } else {
> + submit_bio(bio);
> + }
> }
>
> static void __submit_merged_bio(struct f2fs_bio_info *io)
> @@ -484,6 +507,9 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> enum page_type btype = PAGE_TYPE_OF_BIO(fio->type);
> struct f2fs_bio_info *io = sbi->write_io[btype] + fio->temp;
> struct page *bio_page;
> + struct inode *fio_inode, *bio_inode;
> + struct page *first_page;
> + u64 next_dun = 0;
>
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_read_io(fio->op));
>
> @@ -512,10 +538,29 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>
> inc_page_count(sbi, WB_DATA_TYPE(bio_page));
>
> + fio_inode = fio->page->mapping->host;
> + bio_inode = NULL;
> + first_page = NULL;
> + next_dun = 0;
> + if (io->bio) {
> + first_page = bio_page(io->bio);
> + if (first_page->mapping) {
> + bio_inode = first_page->mapping->host;
> + if (fscrypt_inode_is_hw_encrypted(bio_inode)) {
> + next_dun =
> + hw_crypt_dun(bio_inode, first_page) +
> + (io->bio->bi_iter.bi_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> if (io->bio && (io->last_block_in_bio != fio->new_blkaddr - 1 ||
> (io->fio.op != fio->op || io->fio.op_flags != fio->op_flags) ||
> - !__same_bdev(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr, io->bio)))
> + !__same_bdev(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr, io->bio) ||
> + !fscrypt_inode_crypt_mergeable(bio_inode, fio_inode) ||
> + (fscrypt_inode_is_hw_encrypted(bio_inode) &&
> + next_dun != hw_crypt_dun(fio_inode, fio->page))))
The merge condition becomes so complicated and looks not so clean, I just
suggest we can introduce single static inline function to wrap all inline
encryption condition, which can help to make codes more clean.
> __submit_merged_bio(io);
> +
> alloc_new:
> if (io->bio == NULL) {
> if ((fio->type == DATA || fio->type == NODE) &&
> @@ -570,7 +615,7 @@ static struct bio *f2fs_grab_read_bio(struct inode *inode, block_t blkaddr,
> bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_read_end_io;
> bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_READ, op_flag);
>
> - if (f2fs_encrypted_file(inode))
> + if (f2fs_encrypted_file(inode) && !fscrypt_inode_is_hw_encrypted(inode))
> post_read_steps |= 1 << STEP_DECRYPT;
> if (post_read_steps) {
> ctx = mempool_alloc(bio_post_read_ctx_pool, GFP_NOFS);
> @@ -1525,6 +1570,7 @@ static int f2fs_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
> sector_t last_block_in_file;
> sector_t block_nr;
> struct f2fs_map_blocks map;
> + u64 next_dun = 0;
>
> map.m_pblk = 0;
> map.m_lblk = 0;
> @@ -1606,6 +1652,13 @@ static int f2fs_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
> __submit_bio(F2FS_I_SB(inode), bio, DATA);
> bio = NULL;
> }
> +
> + if (bio && fscrypt_inode_is_hw_encrypted(inode) &&
> + next_dun != hw_crypt_dun(inode, page)) {
> + __submit_bio(F2FS_I_SB(inode), bio, DATA);
> + bio = NULL;
> + }
> +
> if (bio == NULL) {
> bio = f2fs_grab_read_bio(inode, block_nr, nr_pages,
> is_readahead ? REQ_RAHEAD : 0);
> @@ -1624,6 +1677,9 @@ static int f2fs_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
> if (bio_add_page(bio, page, blocksize, 0) < blocksize)
> goto submit_and_realloc;
>
> + if (fscrypt_inode_is_hw_encrypted(inode))
> + next_dun = hw_crypt_dun(inode, page) + 1;
> +
> inc_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_RD_DATA);
> ClearPageError(page);
> last_block_in_bio = block_nr;
> @@ -2591,12 +2647,19 @@ static void f2fs_dio_submit_bio(struct bio *bio, struct inode *inode,
> {
> struct f2fs_private_dio *dio;
> bool write = (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE);
> + u64 data_unit_num = (((u64)inode->i_ino) << 32) |
> + ((file_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT) & 0xFFFFFFFF);
Can we allow hw_crypt_dun() to accept @offset as parameter instead of @page? so
we can use hw_crypt_dun() here to replace raw codes.
Thanks,
>
> dio = f2fs_kzalloc(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> sizeof(struct f2fs_private_dio), GFP_NOFS);
> if (!dio)
> goto out;
>
> + if (fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(inode, bio, data_unit_num) != 0) {
> + kvfree(dio);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> dio->inode = inode;
> dio->orig_end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
> dio->orig_private = bio->bi_private;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index f2aaa2cc6b3e..e98c85d42e8d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -2225,6 +2225,7 @@ static const struct fscrypt_operations f2fs_cryptops = {
> .dummy_context = f2fs_dummy_context,
> .empty_dir = f2fs_empty_dir,
> .max_namelen = F2FS_NAME_LEN,
> + .hw_crypt_supp = true,
> };
> #endif
>
>
