Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: avoid to pre-allocate big chunk for sg list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 15:52 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:37:15AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 18:32 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > >  #define  SCSI_INLINE_PROT_SG_CNT  1
> > >  
> > > +#define  SCSI_INLINE_SG_CNT  2
> > 
> > So this patch inserts one kmalloc() and one kfree() call in the hot
> > path for every SCSI request with more than two elements in its
> > scatterlist? Isn't
> 
> Slab or its variants are designed for fast path, and NVMe PCI uses
> slab for allocating sg list in fast path too.

Actually, that's not really true  base kmalloc can do all sorts of
things including kick off reclaim so it's not really something we like
using in the fast path.  The only fast and safe kmalloc you can rely on
 in the fast path is GFP_ATOMIC which will fail quickly if no memory
can easily be found.  *However* the sg_table allocation functions are
all pool backed (lib/sg_pool.c), so they use the lightweight GFP_ATOMIC
mechanism for kmalloc initially coupled with a backing pool in case of
failure to ensure forward progress.

So, I think you're both right: you shouldn't simply use kmalloc, but
this implementation doesn't, it uses the sg_table allocation functions
which correctly control kmalloc to be lightweight and efficient and
able to make forward progress.

James





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux