Re: [PATCH V6 2/9] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/17/19 5:44 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
With holding queue's kobject refcount, it is safe for driver
to schedule requeue. However, blk_mq_kick_requeue_list() may
be called after blk_sync_queue() is done because of concurrent
requeue activities, then requeue work may not be completed when
freeing queue, and kernel oops is triggered.

So moving the cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release() for
avoiding race between requeue and freeing queue.

Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>,
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Cc: jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/blk-core.c | 1 -
  block/blk-mq.c   | 2 ++
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux