Re: [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: allow to run queue if queue refcount is held

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/1/19 10:39 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 3/31/19 7:00 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 08:27:35AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> I'm not sure the approach of this patch series is really the direction we
>>> should pursue. There are many block driver that free resources immediately
>>
>> Please see scsi_run_queue(), and the queue refcount is always held
>> before run queue.
> 
> That's not correct. There is no guarantee that q->q_usage_counter > 0 when scsi_run_queue() is called from inside scsi_requeue_run_queue().
> 
>>> I'd like to avoid having to modify all block drivers that free resources
>>> immediately after blk_cleanup_queue() has returned. Have you considered to
>>> modify blk_mq_run_hw_queues() such that it becomes safe to call that
>>> function while blk_cleanup_queue() is in progress, e.g. by inserting a
>>> percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter) /
>>> percpu_ref_put(&q->q_usage_counter) pair?
>>
>> It can't work because blk_mq_run_hw_queues may happen after
>> percpu_ref_exit() is done.
>>
>> However, if we move percpu_ref_exit() into queue's release handler, we
>> don't need to grab q->q_usage_counter any more in blk_mq_run_hw_queues(),
>> and we still have to free hw queue resources in queue's release handler,
>> that is exactly what this patchset is doing.
>>
>> In short, getting q->q_usage_counter doesn't make a difference on this
>> issue.
> 
> percpu_ref_tryget_live() fails if a per-cpu counter is in the "dead" state. percpu_ref_kill() changes the state of a per-cpu counter to the "dead" state. blk_freeze_queue_start() calls percpu_ref_kill(). blk_cleanup_queue() already calls blk_set_queue_dying() and that last function calls blk_freeze_queue_start(). So I think that what you wrote is not correct and that inserting a percpu_ref_tryget_live()/percpu_ref_put() pair in blk_mq_run_hw_queues() or blk_mq_run_hw_queue() would make a difference and also that moving the percpu_ref_exit() call into blk_release_queue() makes sense.
> 

percpu_ref_tryget would be better to get pending requests to be issued when queue is frozen.

Thanks
Jianchao



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux