On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 10:45 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > James: > > > > I haven't gotten any feedback about these two patch submissions, and they > > aren't in the current scsi-misc GIT: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=116059987422907&w=2 > > This one looks OK ... it's such a tiny micro optimisation, though. I > think I just lost it along the way, sorry. > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=115947226830808&w=2 > > This one has warning phrases like "There are two potential weaknesses in > the patch. One is that when the bad > sense data occurs, it unconditionally calls scsi_requeue_command(). Could > this lead to an infinite loop?" which aren't conducive to immediate application. > > I'll take a look at it when I get some time. > > James Okay, thanks. I just wanted to make sure they didn't vanish down a black hole. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
