Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: change snprintf to scnprintf for possible overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: James Smart <jsmart2021@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: change snprintf to scnprintf for possible overflow
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:14:51 -0400
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@xxxxxxxxx>, James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190321164432.8954-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> (James Smart's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:44:32 -0700")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

James,

> Change snprintf to scnprintf. There are generally two cases where
> using snprintf causes problems.

Applied to 5.2/scsi-queue, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: change snprintf to scnprintf for possible overflow
  - From: James Smart

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: ufs: Add missing MODULE_* information
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: avoid freeing unallocated dma memory
Previous by thread: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: change snprintf to scnprintf for possible overflow
Next by thread: [PATCH v5 0/8] phy: qcom-ufs: Enable regulators to be off in suspend
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux