Hi Bart. Bart Van Assche - 16.03.19, 22:28: > On 3/16/19 3:43 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Bart Van Assche - 16.03.19, 00:27: > >> Since scsi_device_quiesce() skips SCSI devices that have another > >> state than RUNNING, OFFLINE or TRANSPORT_OFFLINE, > >> scsi_device_resume() should not complain about SCSI devices that > >> have been skipped. Hence this patch. This patch avoids that the > >> following warning appears> > >> during resume: > > Am I on CC cause one of those warnings appeared in bug reports from > > me from quite some time ago? […] > That's correct. I hope that you don't mind that I cc'ed you? No, I don't mind. Would you like me to apply the patch in order to test it? As it is just about suppressing a kernel warning and not changing any major functionality, I wondered whether you like me to do with this or whether the CC is more JFYI. > >> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1039 at blk_clear_pm_only+0x2a/0x30 > >> CPU: 3 PID: 1039 Comm: kworker/u8:49 Not tainted 5.0.0+ #1 > >> Hardware name: LENOVO 4180F42/4180F42, BIOS 83ET75WW (1.45 ) > > > > This at least does not appear to be this ThinkPad T520, as I have > > BIOS version 1.49 already. > > The call trace in the patch description is only an example. I think > the problem description and the patch applies to all systems that > have one or more SCSI disks. Best, -- Martin
