Doing a runtime pm get/put as part of ufs_qcom_testbus_config() seems completely unnecessary, since this is called only early during ufs_qcom_init() when the runtime operations are not completely setup for ufs runtime suspend/resume to even work. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c index 3aeadb14aae1..3590741eea2f 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c @@ -1558,7 +1558,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_testbus_config(struct ufs_qcom_host *host) } mask <<= offset; - pm_runtime_get_sync(host->hba->dev); ufshcd_hold(host->hba, false); ufshcd_rmwl(host->hba, TEST_BUS_SEL, (u32)host->testbus.select_major << 19, @@ -1573,7 +1572,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_testbus_config(struct ufs_qcom_host *host) */ mb(); ufshcd_release(host->hba); - pm_runtime_put_sync(host->hba->dev); return 0; } -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation