Marc, > The resolution is simple: we keep the HEAD version, and simply remove > ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused() and its error-handling. > > > Is that the information you were after? Yes. > Do you prefer the patch subject to be: > Revert "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device" > instead of: > scsi: ufs: Do not disable vccq in UFSHC driver > > And I should leave in the automatically added > This reverts commit 60f0187031c05e04cbadffb62f557d0ff3564490. > while adding some information from the manual resolution? Exactly. Thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
