On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 19:48 +-0100, Benjamin Block wrote: +AD4 We had a test-report where, under memory pressure, adding LUNs to the +AD4 systems would fail (the tests add LUNs strictly in sequence): Hi Benjamin, There are two more instances of GFP+AF8-ATOMIC in scsi+AF8-scan.c. Have you verified whether or not it is safe to change these into GFP+AF8-KERNEL too? Thanks, Bart.
