https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201609 --- Comment #4 from James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 03:13 +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201609 > > Pablo Ruiz García (pablo.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx) changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > CC| |pablo.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx > > --- Comment #2 from Pablo Ruiz García (pablo.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx) --- > Hi, > > I've stumbled upon this very same issue, and have created a github > repo with a > fix for the actual issue (see git commit's description for bug > details). > > https://github.com/pruiz/aic94xx-hotfix > https://github.com/pruiz/aic94xx-hotfix/commit/01898ea7dff8eb52f43773 > ea3b59ab41ef2482c8 > > Hope it helps someone. I think the correct fix is to rename the ai94xx revision file (say to aic94x_revision). However I've got to say that commit commit 702ed3be1b1bf4dea05954168321741c0910c645 Author: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Nov 21 16:24:49 2016 -0600 PCI: Create revision file in sysfs Was a blatently silly thing to do without trying to namespace the added file (say calling it something less generic like pci_revision). I assume we're lucky and nothing in userspace depends on the 'revision' sysfs file of the aic driver, but technically I should request reversion of this patch on the grounds that it's broken our ABI (since that's what exported sysfs files are). James -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
