Hi, Friendly ping (second one): Who can ack/review/take this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 12/19/18 9:38 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi, Friendly ping: Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that I replaced "Fall through !!!" with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114971 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c index 2c85f5b1f9c1..7e996bcf026c 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c @@ -2586,6 +2586,7 @@ bfa_ioim_send_ioreq(struct bfa_ioim_s *ioim) case FCP_IODIR_RW: bfa_stats(itnim, input_reqs); bfa_stats(itnim, output_reqs); + /* fall through */ default: bfi_h2i_set(m->mh, BFI_MC_IOIM_IO, 0, bfa_fn_lpu(ioim->bfa)); } @@ -2820,6 +2821,7 @@ bfa_ioim_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s *m) case BFI_IOIM_STS_TIMEDOUT: bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_timedout); + /* fall through */ case BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED: rsp->io_status = BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED; bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_aborted); @@ -3215,9 +3217,7 @@ bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup_qfull(struct bfa_tskim_s *tskim, switch (event) { case BFA_TSKIM_SM_DONE: bfa_reqq_wcancel(&tskim->reqq_wait); - /* - * Fall through !!! - */ + /* fall through */ case BFA_TSKIM_SM_QRESUME: bfa_sm_set_state(tskim, bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup); bfa_tskim_send_abort(tskim);
