Re: Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:43:15 -0500
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, chenxiang <chenxiang66@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <0336fcc8-cfc5-ab51-b2cd-3ad6b971cc8a@huawei.com> (John Garry's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:04:54 +0000")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

John,

> What would we be missing that this is unset?

60a89a3ce0cc scsi: t10-pi: Return correct ref tag when queue has no integrity profile

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()
  - From: John Garry

References:
- Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()
  - From: John Garry

Prev by Date: Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()
Next by Date: Re: Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()
Previous by thread: Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()
Next by thread: Re: Question on t10_pi_ref_tag()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux