Re: [RFC PATCH] target: sanitize ALUA and PR state file paths before use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping - any feedback on this change?

On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:38:00 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote:

> Block ALUA and PR state storage if any of the dynamic subdirectory
> components include a path separator.
> 
> Fixes: c66ac9db8d4a ("[SCSI] target: Add LIO target core v4.0.0-rc6")
> Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Note:
> Submitted as an RFC, as I've not properly tested the alua code path.
> I'm also not sure whether it's reasonable to break existing setups
> with a '/' in the configured unit_serial. Where "break" means fail
> APTPL PR requests; ALUA state-save failures are ignored internally.

I'd also be happy with any pointers on properly testing ALUA.

Cheers, David



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux