Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:08:48 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20181128100659.GA16495@ming.t460p>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 06:07:01PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Is this the nvme target on top of null_blk?
> 
> Yes.

And it goes away if you revert just the last patch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
  - From: Ming Lei
- Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
  - From: Keith Busch

References:
- [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
  - From: Keith Busch
- Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
  - From: Ming Lei
- Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
  - From: Ming Lei

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/41] scsi: NCR5380: Mark expected switch fall-through
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
Next by thread: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]