In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "!!! fall through !!!"
with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to
find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
index b4f2c1d8742e..646f09f66443 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
@@ -6430,9 +6430,7 @@ bfa_fcs_vport_sm_logo_for_stop(struct bfa_fcs_vport_s *vport,
switch (event) {
case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_OFFLINE:
bfa_sm_send_event(vport->lps, BFA_LPS_SM_OFFLINE);
- /*
- * !!! fall through !!!
- */
+ /* fall through */
case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_OK:
case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_ERROR:
@@ -6458,9 +6456,7 @@ bfa_fcs_vport_sm_logo(struct bfa_fcs_vport_s *vport,
switch (event) {
case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_OFFLINE:
bfa_sm_send_event(vport->lps, BFA_LPS_SM_OFFLINE);
- /*
- * !!! fall through !!!
- */
+ /* fall through */
case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_OK:
case BFA_FCS_VPORT_SM_RSP_ERROR:
--
2.17.1
