In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough" with "fall through - Missed the backend's Closing state", which contains the "fall through" annotation at the beginnig of the code comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c index 61389bdc7926..bb76d0d2022b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c @@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ static void scsifront_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough */ + /* fall through - Missed the backend's Closing state */ case XenbusStateClosing: scsifront_disconnect(info); break; -- 2.17.1