[PATCH 30/41] scsi: megaraid_sas_fusion: Mark expected switch fall-through

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Fall thru" with a
"Fall through" annotation and added a dash as a token in order to
separate the "Fall through" annotation from the rest of the comment
on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
index c5e6bccb0895..8f37ad83be9a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
@@ -3453,7 +3453,7 @@ complete_cmd_fusion(struct megasas_instance *instance, u32 MSIxIndex)
 				atomic_dec(&lbinfo->scsi_pending_cmds[cmd_fusion->pd_r1_lb]);
 				cmd_fusion->scmd->SCp.Status &= ~MEGASAS_LOAD_BALANCE_FLAG;
 			}
-			//Fall thru and complete IO
+			/* Fall through - and complete IO */
 		case MEGASAS_MPI2_FUNCTION_LD_IO_REQUEST: /* LD-IO Path */
 			atomic_dec(&instance->fw_outstanding);
 			if (cmd_fusion->r1_alt_dev_handle == MR_DEVHANDLE_INVALID) {
-- 
2.17.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux