Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] target: don't assume t10_wwn.vendor is null terminated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] target: don't assume t10_wwn.vendor is null terminated
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:49:24 -0800
Cc: target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxxx, lduncan@xxxxxxxx, cvubrugier@xxxxxxxxxxx, Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20181119210636.22979-3-ddiss@suse.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

This could use a little more explanation, the code doesn't just
add a little if but also changes the existing case.  Also where
can't it be null currently?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] target: don't assume t10_wwn.vendor is null terminated
  - From: David Disseldorp

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/4] target: user configurable T10 Vendor ID
  - From: David Disseldorp
- [PATCH v3 2/4] target: don't assume t10_wwn.vendor is null terminated
  - From: David Disseldorp

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] target: use consistent left-aligned ASCII INQUIRY data
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] target: use consistent left-aligned ASCII INQUIRY data
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 2/4] target: don't assume t10_wwn.vendor is null terminated
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] target: don't assume t10_wwn.vendor is null terminated
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux