On 11/14/18 12:35 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > c2856ae2f315d ("blk-mq: quiesce queue before freeing queue") has > already fixed this race, however the implied synchronize_rcu() > in blk_mq_quiesce_queue() can slow down LUN probe a lot, so caused > performance regression. > > Then 1311326cf4755c7 ("blk-mq: avoid to synchronize rcu inside blk_cleanup_queue()") > tried to only quiesce queue for avoiding unnecessary synchronize_rcu() > in case that queue isn't initialized done. > > However, turns out we still need to quiesce the queue in case that > queue isn't initialized done. Because when one SCSI command is > completed, the user is waken up immediately, then the scsi device > can be removed, meantime the run queue in scsi_end_request() can > be still in-progress, so kernel panic is triggered. > > In Red Hat QE lab, there are several reports about this kind of kernel > panic triggered during kernel booting. > > Fixes: 1311326cf4755c7 ("blk-mq: avoid to synchronize rcu inside blk_cleanup_queue()") > Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > block/blk-core.c | 6 +++--- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index ce12515f9b9b..cf7742a677c4 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -798,9 +798,9 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q) > * dispatch may still be in-progress since we dispatch requests > * from more than one contexts. > * > - * No need to quiesce queue if it isn't initialized yet since > - * blk_freeze_queue() should be enough for cases of passthrough > - * request. > + * We rely on driver to deal with the race in case that queue > + * initialization isn't done. > + * > */ > if (q->mq_ops && blk_queue_init_done(q)) > blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q); > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > index c7fccbb8f554..7ec7a8a2d000 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > @@ -697,13 +697,37 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error, > */ > scsi_mq_uninit_cmd(cmd); > > - __blk_mq_end_request(req, error); > + /* > + * When block queue initialization isn't done, the request > + * queue won't be quiesced in blk_cleanup_queue() for avoiding > + * slowing down LUN probe, so queue still may be run even though > + * its resource is cleaned up, this way can cause kernel panic. > + * > + * Workaround this issue by freeing request after running the > + * queue when queue initialization isn't done, so the queue's > + * usage counter can be held during running queue. > + * > + * This way is safe because sdev->device_busy has been decreased > + * already, and scsi_queue_rq() may guarantee the forward-progress. > + * > + */ > + if (blk_queue_init_done(q)) { > + __blk_mq_end_request(req, error); > + > + if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun || > + !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list)) > + kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work); > + else > + blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true); > + } else { > > - if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun || > - !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list)) > - kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work); > - else > - blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true); > + if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun || > + !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list)) > + kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work); > + else > + blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true); > + __blk_mq_end_request(req, error); > + } > } else { > unsigned long flags; > > Why not get a q_usage_counter during this ? Something like, @@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error, */ scsi_mq_uninit_cmd(cmd); + percpu_ref_get(&q->q_usage_counter) __blk_mq_end_request(req, error); if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun || @@ -618,6 +619,8 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error, else blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true); + percpu_ref_put(&q->q_usage_counter) + put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev); return false; } Thanks Jianchao