Re: aic94xx IO errors with "escb_tasklet_complete: phy0: REQ_TASK_ABORT"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Warner wrote:

> So you are seeing legitimate REQ_TASK_ABORT values, but need to look
> at the remaining data to see what the chip is trying to tell you.
> For REQ_TASK_ABORT, status_block[1..2] is the transaction context,
> and status_block[3] is the reason (TC_NO_ERROR etc from aic94xx_sas.h)

Funny, I've been trying to write at least a REQ_TASK_ABORT handler all
week.  I'm having a bit of trouble using the transaction context...
mostly because the value I'm getting doesn't correspond to any ascb.
Assuming, of course, that ascb->scb->header.index/ascb->tc_index are
indeed transaction contexts.

--D

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux