Re: [PATCH 07/12] lpfc: Correct LCB RJT handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/23/18 10:41 PM, James Smart wrote:
When LCB's are rejected, if beaconing was already in progress, the
Reason Code Explanation was not being set. Should have been set to
command in progress.

Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
index 25625c03a5b3..832e5e00c1c9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
@@ -5776,6 +5776,9 @@ lpfc_els_lcb_rsp(struct lpfc_hba *phba, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *pmb)
  	stat = (struct ls_rjt *)(pcmd + sizeof(uint32_t));
  	stat->un.b.lsRjtRsnCode = LSRJT_UNABLE_TPC;
+ if (shdr_add_status == ADD_STATUS_OPERATION_ALREADY_ACTIVE)
+		stat->un.b.lsRjtRsnCodeExp = LSEXP_CMD_IN_PROGRESS;
+
  	elsiocb->iocb_cmpl = lpfc_cmpl_els_rsp;
  	phba->fc_stat.elsXmitLSRJT++;
  	rc = lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, LPFC_ELS_RING, elsiocb, 0);

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux