Re: [PATCH] bsg: convert to use blk-mq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/24/18 5:52 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/24/18 5:30 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/24/18 5:19 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 03:23:30AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> JFYI, I also reordered the series to make it correct. You can apply
>>>> this one:
>>>>
>>>> http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=mq-conversions&id=2b2ffa16193e9a69a076595ed64429b8cc9b42aa
>>>>
>>>> before the bsg patch, and it should be fine. Or just use the above branch,
>>>> of course.
>>>
>>> Hell no on that one.  The behavior of having methods right on the
>>> request_queue which can be changed any time is something we absolutely
>>> must not introduce into blk-mq.
>>
>> I agree it's not the prettiest, but it's not like it's something
>> that is changed at runtime.
>>
>>> Just add pass a timeout hander to bsg_register_queue which is called
>>> from the bsg ->timeout handler is a much better way to sort our your
>>> problem.  It can also easily be turned into an independent prep patch.
>>
>> Good idea, that is cleaner.
> 
> Except that STILL doesn't work with mq_ops being a constant, I'd have
> to allocate it.

Which obviously won't work. I don't see a good way out of this, since
I can't store the private timeout handler anywhere. Open to suggestions,
but until something better comes up, I'm keeping q->timeout and
removing the API to set it. bsg-lib can just manually set it in the
queue.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux