On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:51 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 10/12/18 1:36 PM, Laurence Oberman wrote: > > While I have for the longest time used 4.5 as a base for my F/C > jammer > > that I use every day here in our lab I recently added more jammer > code > > so I decided to test this all on latest upstream. > > > > Booting the target server on my 4.5 kernel with jammer code is > > flawless and serves LUNS with no issues and handles the jamming > also > > fine. > > > > However just building a 4.19.0_rc7+-1 (I left the jammer stuff > out) > > its pretty broken. > > A large number of patches went upstream between these two kernel > versions for both the QLogic initiator and target drivers. From the > logs > it seems like you were using QLogic hardware at both the initiator > and > target side? If so, which kernel version was running at the > initiator > side during these tests? 4.5, 4.19-rc7+ or yet another version? > > Thanks, > > Bart. > > I had only replied to Bart, this was my reply, reply all now Hi Bart Thank you for always being helpful. I am using at the moment RHEL 7.5 for the initiator (based on kernel 3.10 but of course lots of backports) The exact same initiator is working fine with the 4.5 and I would not expect the target to require the same kernel level. Of course I will try latest upstream on the initiator later and reply back. I was thinking the target should adhere to the standards and support many types of kernels within reason for the initiator. Thanks