On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:10AM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc, it incorrectly assumes no > signals will be pending for task_struct executing the normal session shutdown > and I/O quiesce code-path. > > For example, iscsi-target and iser-target issue SIGINT to all kthreads as > part of session shutdown. This has been the behaviour since day one. Not knowing much context here; but does it make sense for those kthreads to handle signals, ever? Most kthreads should be fine with ignore_signals().
