> On Oct 9, 2018, at 10:23 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> With the addition of commit 00d909a107 in v4.19-rc, it incorrectly assumes no
> signals will be pending for task_struct executing the normal session shutdown
> and I/O quiesce code-path.
>
> For example, iscsi-target and iser-target issue SIGINT to all kthreads as
> part of session shutdown. This has been the behaviour since day one.
>
> As-is when signals are pending with se_cmds active in se_sess->sess_cmd_list,
> wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout() returns a negative number and
> immediately kills the machine because of the do while (ret <= 0) loop that
> was added in commit 00d909a107 to spin while backend I/O is taking any
> amount of extended time (say 30 seconds) to complete.
>
> Here's what it looks like in action with debug plus delayed backend I/O
> completion:
>
> [ 4951.909951] se_sess: 000000003e7e08fa before target_wait_for_sess_cmds
> [ 4951.914600] target_wait_for_sess_cmds: signal_pending: 1
> [ 4951.918015] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 0
> [ 4951.921639] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 1
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 2
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 3
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 4
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 5
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 6
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 7
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 8
> [ 4951.921944] wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout ret: -512 signal_pending: 1 loop count: 9
>
> ... followed by the usual RCU CPU stalls and deadlock.
>
> There was never a case pre commit 00d909a107 where wait_for_complete(&se_cmd->cmd_wait_comp)
> was able to be interruptted, so to address this for v4.19+ moving forward go ahead and
> use wait_event_lock_irq_timeout() instead so new code works with all fabric drivers.
>
> Also for commit 00d909a107, fix a minor regression in target_release_cmd_kref()
> to only wake_up the new se_sess->cmd_list_wq only when shutdown has actually
> been triggered via se_sess->sess_tearing_down.
>
> Fixes: 00d909a107 ("scsi: target: Make the session shutdown code also wait for commands that are being aborted")
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Bryant G. Ly <bly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Bryant
