Re: [PATCH] libosd: Remove ignored __weak attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/30/18 1:54 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/scsi/osd_types.h b/include/scsi/osd_types.h
> > index 48e8a165e136..6b6fdcafa6cc 100644
> > --- a/include/scsi/osd_types.h
> > +++ b/include/scsi/osd_types.h
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct osd_obj_id {
> >   	osd_id id;
> >   };
> > -static const struct __weak osd_obj_id osd_root_object = {0, 0};
> > +static const struct osd_obj_id osd_root_object = {0, 0};
> 

Hi Bart,

> Structure definitions should occur in .c files instead of in header files
> especially if the header file is included from multiple source files. Please
> consider moving the definition of osd_root_object into a .c file.
> Additionally, zero initializers should be left out to minimize the size of
> object files.
> 

I'm perfectly happy to make this change in a v2 if necessary.

> Boaz, the most recent osd patch that is neither trivial nor treewide
> refactoring is six years old (51976a8c85ce ("[SCSI] osd_uld: Add osdname &
> systemid sysfs at scsi_osd class"). That suggests that nobody is using this
> driver anymore. Can this driver be removed from the kernel tree?
> 

However, this is certainly a better option if possible.

> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

Thanks for the comments!
Nathan



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux