Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: don't allow negative thresholds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: don't allow negative thresholds
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:51:22 -0400
Cc: qla2xxx-upstream@xxxxxxxxxx, Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@xxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180920100236.GB9551@mwanda> (Dan Carpenter's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:02:36 +0300")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

Dan,

> We shouldn't allow negative thresholds.  I don't know what it would do
> but it can't be good.

Applied to 4.20/scsi-queue, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: don't allow negative thresholds
  - From: Dan Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix comment in MODULE_PARM_DESC in qla2xxx
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] scsi: bfa: Avoid implicit enum conversion in bfad_im_post_vendor_event
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: don't allow negative thresholds
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 0/6] mpt3sas: Hot-Plug Surprise removal support on IOC.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux