Per, >>We have it at error level because many consumer devices lie about >>having caches and we would like the users to know that their data >>integrity may be at risk. > > There are users that get confused by these errors thinking something > is broken. Something is broken: Their hardware! > Would you consider to use warning level instead or do you still prefer > error? This question pops up every few months. I'm not particularly married to error level except it has been there for ages. But how many users actually know what their current log level is set to? And how to tweak it? So I don't think the log level issue is particularly interesting in itself. I think it would be more worthwhile to massage the message. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
