Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: libsas: fix a race condition when smp task timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2018/9/17 17:47, John Garry wrote:
On 12/09/2018 09:29, Jason Yan wrote:
When the lldd is processing the complete sas task in interrupt and set
the task stat as SAS_TASK_STATE_DONE, the smp timeout timer is able to
be triggered at the same time. And smp_task_timedout() will complete the
task wheter the SAS_TASK_STATE_DONE is set or not. Then the sas task may
freed before lldd end the interrupt process. Thus a use-after-free will
happen.

Fix this by calling the complete() only when SAS_TASK_STATE_DONE is not
set. And remove the check of the return value of the del_timer().


Hi Jason,

Please mention that once the LLDD sets DONE, it must call task->done(),
which will call smp_task_done()->complete()


OK

Reported-by: chenxiang <chenxiang66@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
CC: Ewan Milne <emilne@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
CC: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index 52222940d398..0d1f72752ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -48,17 +48,16 @@ static void smp_task_timedout(struct timer_list *t)
     unsigned long flags;

     spin_lock_irqsave(&task->task_state_lock, flags);
-    if (!(task->task_state_flags & SAS_TASK_STATE_DONE))
+    if (!(task->task_state_flags & SAS_TASK_STATE_DONE)) {
         task->task_state_flags |= SAS_TASK_STATE_ABORTED;
+        complete(&task->slow_task->completion);

Nit: for consistency with any other time we use this lock, can we call
complete() outside the lock? Maybe just use a flag variable for this.


Is it necessary to add a variable just for consistency with other places?

+    }
     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->task_state_lock, flags);
-
-    complete(&task->slow_task->completion);
 }

 static void smp_task_done(struct sas_task *task)
 {
-    if (!del_timer(&task->slow_task->timer))
-        return;
+    del_timer(&task->slow_task->timer);
     complete(&task->slow_task->completion);
 }

Do we also need this change or similar:
static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
     if ((task->task_state_flags & SAS_TASK_STATE_ABORTED)) {
         SAS_DPRINTK("smp task timed out or aborted\n");
         i->dft->lldd_abort_task(task);
-        if (!(task->task_state_flags & SAS_TASK_STATE_DONE)) {
-            SAS_DPRINTK("SMP task aborted and not done\n");
-            break;
-        }
+        break;

To me, the ABORTED and DONE states are mutually exclusive.


This changes the logic a bit. To be safe, maybe we shall do this with another patch after some tests.




Thanks,
John



.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux