On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There's currently a warning about string overflow with strncat: > > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c: In function 'ibmvscsis_probe': > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c:3479:2: error: 'strncat' specified > bound 64 equals destination size [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] > strncat(vscsi->eye, vdev->name, MAX_EYE); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Switch to using strlcat which correctly accounts for lengths that > are equal to the destination buffer. > > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c > index fac377320158..53d344d8dc43 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c > @@ -3475,7 +3475,7 @@ static int ibmvscsis_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, > vscsi->dds.window[REMOTE].liobn); > > strcpy(vscsi->eye, "VSCSI "); > - strncat(vscsi->eye, vdev->name, MAX_EYE); > + strlcat(vscsi->eye, vdev->name, MAX_EYE); Can this just get switched to snprintf() instead? snprintf(vscsi->eye, sizeof(vscsi->eye), "VSCSI%s", vdev->name); > vscsi->dds.unit_id = vdev->unit_address; > strncpy(vscsi->dds.partition_name, partition_name, And does this strncpy need a NUL-termination and/or trailing padding? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security