Re: [PATCH 1/5] qedf: fixup bit operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 15:53 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> test_bit() is atomic, test_bit() || test_bit() is not.
> So protect consecutive bit tests with a lock to avoid races.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_els.c  | 9 +++++++--
>  drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c | 5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_els.c
> b/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_els.c
> index 04f0c4d2e256..acb8157a96a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_els.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_els.c
> @@ -335,20 +335,25 @@ void qedf_restart_rport(struct qedf_rport
> *fcport)
>  	struct fc_lport *lport;
>  	struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
>  	u32 port_id;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	if (!fcport)
>  		return;
>  
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&fcport->rport_lock, flags);
>  	if (test_bit(QEDF_RPORT_IN_RESET, &fcport->flags) ||
>  	    !test_bit(QEDF_RPORT_SESSION_READY, &fcport->flags) ||
>  	    test_bit(QEDF_RPORT_UPLOADING_CONNECTION, &fcport->flags)) 

Could you avoid the need for locking like this?
       
        unsigned long flgs = atomic_read(&fcport->flags);
        if (flgs &  (QEDF_RPORT_IN_RESET|QEDF_RPORT_UPLOADING_CONNECTION) ||
            !flgs & QEDF_RPORT_SESSION_READY) {

Regards,
Martin





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux