Re: [PATCH] libfc: remove unnecessary condition check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfc: remove unnecessary condition check
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:37:33 -0400
Cc: jth@xxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180827235008.14051-1-cgxu519@gmx.com> (Chengguang Xu's message of "Tue, 28 Aug 2018 07:50:08 +0800")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

Chengguang,

> kmem_cache_destroy() can handle NULL pointer correctly, so there is
> no need to check NULL pointer before calling kmem_cache_destroy()

Applied to 4.20/scsi-queue, thank you.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] libfc: remove unnecessary condition check
  - From: Chengguang Xu

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: remove an unnecessary NULL check
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] crypto: Introduce notifier for new crypto algorithms
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libfc: remove unnecessary condition check
Next by thread: [PATCH] virtio_scsi: remove unnecessary condition check
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux