Dear Greg, On 08/10/18 15:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 03:21:52PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: >> Dear Greg, >> >> >> Commit ef86f3a7 (genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs) added >> for Linux 4.14.56 causes the aacraid module to not detect the attached devices >> anymore on a Dell PowerEdge R720 with two six core 24x E5-2630 @ 2.30GHz. >> >> ``` >> $ dmesg | grep raid >> [ 0.269768] raid6: sse2x1 gen() 7179 MB/s >> [ 0.290069] raid6: sse2x1 xor() 5636 MB/s >> [ 0.311068] raid6: sse2x2 gen() 9160 MB/s >> [ 0.332076] raid6: sse2x2 xor() 6375 MB/s >> [ 0.353075] raid6: sse2x4 gen() 11164 MB/s >> [ 0.374064] raid6: sse2x4 xor() 7429 MB/s >> [ 0.379001] raid6: using algorithm sse2x4 gen() 11164 MB/s >> [ 0.386001] raid6: .... xor() 7429 MB/s, rmw enabled >> [ 0.391008] raid6: using ssse3x2 recovery algorithm >> [ 3.559682] megaraid cmm: 2.20.2.7 (Release Date: Sun Jul 16 00:01:03 EST 2006) >> [ 3.570061] megaraid: 2.20.5.1 (Release Date: Thu Nov 16 15:32:35 EST 2006) >> [ 10.725767] Adaptec aacraid driver 1.2.1[50834]-custom >> [ 10.731724] aacraid 0000:04:00.0: can't disable ASPM; OS doesn't have ASPM control >> [ 10.743295] aacraid: Comm Interface type3 enabled >> $ lspci -nn | grep Adaptec >> 04:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller [0107]: Adaptec Series 8 12G SAS/PCIe 3 [9005:028d] (rev 01) >> 42:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller [0107]: Adaptec Smart Storage PQI 12G SAS/PCIe 3 [9005:028f] (rev 01) >> ``` >> >> But, it still works with a Dell PowerEdge R715 with two eight core AMD >> Opteron 6136, the card below. >> >> ``` >> $ lspci -nn | grep Adaptec >> 22:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller [0107]: Adaptec Series 8 12G SAS/PCIe 3 [9005:028d] (rev 01) >> ``` >> >> Reverting the commit fixes the issue. >> >> commit ef86f3a72adb8a7931f67335560740a7ad696d1d >> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> >> Date: Fri Jan 12 10:53:05 2018 +0800 >> >> genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs >> >> commit 84676c1f21e8ff54befe985f4f14dc1edc10046b upstream. >> >> Currently we assign managed interrupt vectors to all present CPUs. This >> works fine for systems were we only online/offline CPUs. But in case of >> systems that support physical CPU hotplug (or the virtualized version of >> it) this means the additional CPUs covered for in the ACPI tables or on >> the command line are not catered for. To fix this we'd either need to >> introduce new hotplug CPU states just for this case, or we can start >> assining vectors to possible but not present CPUs. >> >> Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Fixes: 4b855ad37194 ("blk-mq: Create hctx for each present CPU") >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The problem doesn’t happen with Linux 4.17.11, so there are commits in >> Linux master fixing this. Unfortunately, my attempts to find out failed. >> >> I was able to cherry-pick the three commits below on top of 4.14.62, >> but the problem persists. >> >> 6aba81b5a2f5 genirq/affinity: Don't return with empty affinity masks on error >> 355d7ecdea35 scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue >> e944e9615741 scsi: virtio_scsi: fix IO hang caused by automatic irq vector affinity >> >> Trying to cherry-pick the commits below, referencing the commit >> in question, gave conflicts. >> >> 1. adbe552349f2 scsi: megaraid_sas: fix selection of reply queue >> 2. d3056812e7df genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible >> >> To avoid further trial and error with the server with a slow firmware, >> do you know what commits should fix the issue? > > Look at the email on the stable mailing list: > Subject: Re: Fix for 84676c1f (b5b6e8c8) missing in 4.14.y > it should help you out here. Ah, I didn’t see that [1] yet. Also I can’t find the original message, and a way to reply to that thread. Therefore, here is my reply. > Can you try the patches listed there? I tried some of these already without success. b5b6e8c8d3b4 scsi: virtio_scsi: fix IO hang caused by automatic irq vector affinity 2f31115e940c scsi: core: introduce force_blk_mq adbe552349f2 scsi: megaraid_sas: fix selection of reply queue The commit above is already in v4.14.56. 8b834bff1b73 scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue The problem persists. The problem also persists with the state below. 3528f73a4e5d scsi: core: introduce force_blk_mq 16dc4d8215f3 scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue f0a7ab12232d scsi: virtio_scsi: fix IO hang caused by automatic irq vector affinity 6aba81b5a2f5 genirq/affinity: Don't return with empty affinity masks on error 1aa1166eface (tag: v4.14.62, stable/linux-4.14.y) Linux 4.14.62 So, some more commits are necessary. Kind regards, Paul [1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg251103.html
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature