On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 21:46 +-0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote: +AD4- +AFs-Sreekanth+AF0- In the patch description I mentioned that I have done a +AD4- manual mistake and I am correcting with this patch. +AD4- +AD4- Hope I have answered all of your quires. Not yet unfortunately. Why do you consider the current implementation a wrong? Why is the patch at the start of this e-mail thread considered a fix? Which behavior changes due to this patch? If this patch is a bug fix, how can the bug be triggered and why is this patch considered the right way to fix that bug? Thanks, Bart.
