Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] streamline some logical operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018/08/06 13:51, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Re-arrange some logic to lessen the number of checks. With logical
> ANDs put the least likely first, with logical ORs put the most
> likely first. Also add conditional hints on the assumed fastpath.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 9f047fd3c92d..05014054e357 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -1171,9 +1171,9 @@ static int sd_setup_read_write_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  
>  	fua = (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA) ? 0x8 : 0;
>  	dix = scsi_prot_sg_count(cmd);
> -	dif = scsi_host_dif_capable(cmd->device->host, sdkp->protection_type);
> +	dif = scsi_host_dif_capable(sdp->host, sdkp->protection_type);
>  
> -	if (write && dix)
> +	if (dix && write)
>  		sd_dif_prepare(cmd);
>  
>  	if (dif || dix)
> @@ -1181,19 +1181,27 @@ static int sd_setup_read_write_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  	else
>  		protect = 0;
>  
> -	if (protect && sdkp->protection_type == T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION) {
> +	if (unlikely(protect &&
> +		     sdkp->protection_type == T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION))
>  		ret = sd_setup_read_write_32_cmnd(cmd, write, lba, nr_blocks,
>  						  protect | fua);
> -	} else if (sdp->use_16_for_rw || (nr_blocks > 0xffff)) {
> +	else if (sdp->use_16_for_rw)
>  		ret = sd_setup_read_write_16_cmnd(cmd, write, lba, nr_blocks,
>  						  protect | fua);

So here, without use_16_for_rw being forced on (which is the case for most disks
I think, except ZBC disks which mandate it) or most disks, all read/write to low
LBAs will have to go through a longer chain of if/else if... Is this change
really such a gain in average ? It looks like this will be a loss for the first
small partition at the beginning of the disk.

> -	} else if ((nr_blocks > 0xff) || (lba > 0x1fffff) || sdp->use_10_for_rw
> -		   || protect) {
> -		ret = sd_setup_read_write_10_cmnd(cmd, write, lba, nr_blocks,
> -						  protect | fua);
> -	} else {
> -		ret = sd_setup_read_write_6_cmnd(cmd, write, lba, nr_blocks,
> -						 protect | fua);
> +	else if (likely(nr_blocks < 0x100)) {
> +		if (sdp->use_10_for_rw || (lba > 0x1fffff) || protect)
> +			ret = sd_setup_read_write_10_cmnd(cmd, write, lba,
> +						 nr_blocks, protect | fua);
> +		else
> +			ret = sd_setup_read_write_6_cmnd(cmd, write, lba,
> +						 nr_blocks, protect | fua);
> +	} else {	/* not already done and nr_blocks > 0xff */
> +		if (unlikely(nr_blocks > 0xffff))
> +			ret = sd_setup_read_write_16_cmnd(cmd, write, lba,
> +						 nr_blocks, protect | fua);
> +		else
> +			ret = sd_setup_read_write_10_cmnd(cmd, write, lba,
> +						 nr_blocks, protect | fua);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret != BLKPREP_OK)
> @@ -1976,7 +1984,6 @@ static int sd_done(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
>  	struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(SCpnt->request->rq_disk);
>  	struct request *req = SCpnt->request;
>  	int sense_valid = 0;
> -	int sense_deferred = 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Assumption that REQ_OP_READ and REQ_OP_WRITE are 0 and 1 is
> @@ -2030,16 +2037,14 @@ static int sd_done(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (result) {
> +	if (unlikely(result)) {
>  		sense_valid = scsi_command_normalize_sense(SCpnt, &sshdr);
> -		if (sense_valid)
> -			sense_deferred = scsi_sense_is_deferred(&sshdr);
> +		if (driver_byte(result) == DRIVER_SENSE ||
> +		    (sense_valid && (!scsi_sense_is_deferred(&sshdr))))
> +			good_bytes = sd_done_sense(SCpnt, good_bytes, &sshdr);
>  	}
> -	sdkp->medium_access_timed_out = 0;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(driver_byte(result) == DRIVER_SENSE ||
> -		     (sense_valid && !sense_deferred)))
> -		good_bytes = sd_done_sense(SCpnt, good_bytes, &sshdr);
> +	sdkp->medium_access_timed_out = 0;
>  
>  	if (sd_is_zoned(sdkp))
>  		sd_zbc_complete(SCpnt, good_bytes, &sshdr);
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux