On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 18:55 +-0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: +AD4- On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Bart Van Assche +ADw-Bart.VanAssche+AEA-wdc.com+AD4- wrote: +AD4- +AD4- On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 06:31 -0400, Sreekanth Reddy wrote: +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +- /+ACo- Added memory barrier to make sure that correct chain tracker +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +- +ACo- is retrieved before incrementing the smid pool's chain+AF8-offset +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +- +ACo- value in chain lookup table. +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +- +ACo-/ +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Please verify your patch with checkpatch and use the proper kernel comment style. +AD4- +AD4- This kind of style is what net subsystem is using. Last time I heard +AD4- about this was that checkpatch doesn't distinguish subsystem and thus +AD4- allows this kind of style. Since consistency is appreciated in Linux kernel code and since most other comments in SCSI code start with +ACI-/+ACoAIg- on a line by itself I think that's the preferred style for SCSI code. Thanks, Bart.
