On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 22:47 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: +AD4- Hey Bart, I looked into this some more and this value is also being used +AD4- as the scsiAttIntrPortIndex. For that use, does it need to be unique +AD4- across a target when the target has multiple ports? +AD4- +AD4- So I think it needs to be on the se+AF8-wwn right? Hello Mike, I think the best solution would be to decouple the session index that is used to export session information through configfs from the session index used by the SCSI-MIB (scsiAttIntrPortIndex). That approach would allow to make both indexes consecutive integers in all cases for both interfaces. However, neither configfs nor the SCSI-MIB requires that session indexes are consecutive integers. So I think moving se+AF8-sess+AF8-idr+AF8-lock and se+AF8-sess+AF8-idr into struct se+AF8-wwn is fine. Bart.
