On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 10:40 -0700, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I see a PORTE_BYTES_DMAED event, followed by a PHYE_LOSS_OF_SIGNAL event > and then followed by a PORTE_BYTES_DMAED event on the same phy. The code > seems to just drop the last event because of the not yet processed first > event. So, it just processes the first two events in that order. In > other words, the link doesn't get used at all! I am seeing a very similar issue with hot-plugging on the x260 systems with the internal expanders. If a disk is pulled and plugged back in right away then the PORTE_BROADCAST_RCVD event that was triggered when the disk is plugged back in is dropped, causing the disk to never be rediscovered. If there is enough of a delay between unplugging and plugging then both PORTE_BROADCAST_RCVD events are processed correctly. Any ideas on what would cause these events to be dropped? --Alexis > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
