Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] snic: fix printing time intervals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arnd,

> We don't want to use 'struct timespec' because of the y2038 overflow
> problem. The overflow is not actually an issue here, but it's easy to
> replace with 'timespec64' for consistency. However, it's worth pointing
> out that nanosecond values have nine digits, not eight or ten, so I'm
> fixing the format strings accordingly as well.

Applied to 4.19/scsi-queue, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux