On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:58:39AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 6/22/18 5:42 AM, Andrew Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:55:22AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> SCSI probing may synchronously create and destroy a lot of request_queues > >> for non-existent devices. Any synchronize_rcu() in queue creation or > >> destroy path may introduce long latency during booting, see detailed > >> description in comment of blk_register_queue(). > >> > >> This patch removes two synchronize_rcu() inside blk_cleanup_queue() > >> for this case: > >> > >> 1) commit c2856ae2f315d75(blk-mq: quiesce queue before freeing queue) > >> need synchronize_rcu() for implementing blk_mq_quiesce_queue(), but > >> when queue isn't initialized, it isn't necessary to do that since > >> only pass-through requests are involved, no original issue in > >> scsi_execute() at all. > >> > >> 2) when only one request queue is attached to tags, no necessary to > >> call synchronize_rcu() too. > >> > >> Without this patch, it may take more 20+ seconds for virtio-scsi to > >> complete disk probe. With this patch, the time becomes less than 100ms. > >> > >> Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++-- > >> block/blk-mq.c | 5 ++++- > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > >> index cf0ee764b908..f0129e20b773 100644 > >> --- a/block/blk-core.c > >> +++ b/block/blk-core.c > >> @@ -766,9 +766,13 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q) > >> * make sure all in-progress dispatch are completed because > >> * blk_freeze_queue() can only complete all requests, and > >> * dispatch may still be in-progress since we dispatch requests > >> - * from more than one contexts > >> + * from more than one contexts. > >> + * > >> + * No need to quiesce queue if it isn't initialized yet since > >> + * blk_freeze_queue() should be enough for cases of passthrough > >> + * request. > >> */ > >> - if (q->mq_ops) > >> + if (q->mq_ops && blk_queue_init_done(q)) > >> blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q); > >> > >> /* for synchronous bio-based driver finish in-flight integrity i/o */ > >> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > >> index 70c65bb6c013..63680b243466 100644 > >> --- a/block/blk-mq.c > >> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > >> @@ -2351,6 +2351,7 @@ static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, > >> static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q) > >> { > >> struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set; > >> + bool shared = true; > >> > >> mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock); > >> list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list); > >> @@ -2359,9 +2360,11 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q) > >> set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED; > >> /* update existing queue */ > >> blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false); > >> + shared = true; > > > > I guess this should be '= false'. > > > >> } > >> mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock); > >> - synchronize_rcu(); > >> + if (shared) > >> + synchronize_rcu(); > >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list); > >> } > >> > > > > With the '= false' change I tested this and it resolves the issue for me. > > That logic still doesn't look correct to me. Does the below work? > > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index afd2596ea3d3..222d4fc0e524 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -762,9 +762,13 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q) > * make sure all in-progress dispatch are completed because > * blk_freeze_queue() can only complete all requests, and > * dispatch may still be in-progress since we dispatch requests > - * from more than one contexts > + * from more than one contexts. > + * > + * No need to quiesce queue if it isn't initialized yet since > + * blk_freeze_queue() should be enough for cases of passthrough > + * request. > */ > - if (q->mq_ops) > + if (q->mq_ops && blk_queue_init_done(q)) > blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q); > > /* for synchronous bio-based driver finish in-flight integrity i/o */ > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 8e57b84e50e9..18ad2b95ff63 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -2351,8 +2351,12 @@ static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, > static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q) > { > struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set; > + bool shared; > > mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock); > + > + shared = !list_is_singular(&set->tag_list); Or: shared = set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED; > + > list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list); > if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) { > /* just transitioned to unshared */ > @@ -2361,7 +2365,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q) > blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false); > } > mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock); > - synchronize_rcu(); > + if (shared) > + synchronize_rcu(); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list); > } > > > -- > Jens Axboe > Will prepare a V2 soon. Thanks, Ming