Re: [VERY EARLY RFC 08/13] treewide: use set_host_byte

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:48:56AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> Every hunk except the last one looks to be equivalent. Not sure why
> the last one is treated differently.

That's a bug I'd say. thanks for catching it.

> Also, I think using two assignments instead of one is a step backwards. Is 
> there a better helper for this?

Yes I think a set_scsi_result(cmd, 0, DID_*, 0, 0); should be way to
go as Hannes said.

Byte,
   Johannes
-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux