Re: [PATCH 1/1] target:separate tx/rx cmd_puds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

The commit summary has a typo (cmd_puds). That said, this change
isn't iSCSI specific, so using "pdu" here doesn't make much sense IMO.

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:52:43 +0800, Zhang Zhuoyu wrote:

> Separate tx/rx cmd_pdus in order to distinguish LUN read/write IOPS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhuoyu <zhangzhuoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/target/target_core_stat.c      | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  include/target/target_core_base.h      |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c b/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> index f0db91e..9099494 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> @@ -706,7 +722,8 @@ static ssize_t target_stat_tgt_port_hs_in_cmds_show(struct config_item *item,
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, indx);
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, name);
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, port_index);
> -CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, in_cmds);
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, tx_cmds);
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, rx_cmds);

I don't think the in_cmds metric should be deleted here. It could be
calculated on the fly via tx_cmds + rx_cmds + nodata_cmds.

Cheers, David



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux