Re: [PATCH v2] qla2xxx: Fix race condition between iocb timeout and initialisation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 17:55 +0000, Madhani, Himanshu wrote:
> Hi Ben, 
> 
> > On Mar 21, 2018, at 10:45 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 17:17 +0000, Madhani, Himanshu wrote:
> > > Hi Ben, 
> > > 
> > > > On Mar 20, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > qla2x00_init_timer() calls add_timer() on the iocb timeout timer,
> > > > which means the timeout function pointer and any data that the
> > > > function depends on must be initialised beforehand.
> > > > 
> > > > Move this initialisation before each call to qla2x00_init_timer().  In
> > > > some cases qla2x00_init_timer() initialises a completion structure
> > > > needed by the timeout function, so move the call to add_timer() after
> > > > that.
> > 
> > [...]
> > > What motivated this patch? are you debugging any crash which was
> > > helped by moving code around? 
> > 
> > I saw the recent fix that added a call to del_timer(), noticed the lack
> > of synchronisation and then kept looking further.
> > 
> > > What I see from this patch is that its moving iocb.cmd.timeout field
> > > before qla2x00_init_timer(),
> > > which are completely different from each other. 
> > 
> > How are they "completely different"?  qla2x00_init_timer() starts a
> > timer that will call qla2x00_sp_timeout(), which in turn uses the
> > iocb_cmd.timeout function pointer.  We should not assume that any
> > initialisation code after the call to add_timer() will run before the
> > timer expires, since the scheduler might run other tasks for the whole
> > time.  It's unlikely but not impossible.
> > 
> 
> I see. I used “completely different” due to the lack of better wording. 
> 
> I wanted to get context and understand if there was any issue that would
> have helped with these changes. 
> 
> your explanation does help and I agree that there is window where timer() will 
> pop before timeout is initialized. 
> 
> Let me put this patch in our test cycle for couple days and will respond on this one

Thanks.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux