Re: [PATCH] megaraid_sas: Re-enable WRITE SAME

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shivasharan,

> So my understanding is when driver sets no_write_same flag, it is only
> disabling BLKZEROOUT/write_zeroes requests from using WRITE SAME
> command.  Instead individual writes are sent to zero the blocks (if
> BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK flag is not set).

Correct.

> Our inhouse driver code did not set the no_write_same flag.  And so
> far we have not seen any issues in this area with inhouse driver.  I
> am running tests now to check firmware behavior you mentioned.  Will
> get back to you with the results.

> Are you aware of any issue that led to this change?

My recollection is that there were older MR controllers that would cause
problems when receiving a WRITE SAME command. I can't remember whether
this was with VD or PD.

For logical block provisioning we rely on LBPME in READ CAPACITY(16) and
the VPD page. So if you want to enable WRITE SAME for the purposes of
ATA TRIM translation or SCSI unmapping, filling out the block
provisioning fields correctly should suffice.

If you want to enable WRITE SAME for the purpose of zeroing block ranges
and the disk has an ATA Information VPD page, you need to set
no_write_same = 0 in the host template as well as claim support for
WRITE SAME(10) or WRITE SAME(16) in REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION
CODES. Otherwise we'll disable zeroing under the assumption that the SAT
does not handle this correctly (which used to be the case).

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux