On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 08:17 +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:25:46AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 18:15 +0200, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote:
> > > +enum ufs_desc_param_size {
> > > + UFS_PARAM_BYTE_SIZE = 1,
> > > + UFS_PARAM_WORD_SIZE = 2,
> > > + UFS_PARAM_DWORD_SIZE = 4,
> > > + UFS_PARAM_QWORD_SIZE = 8,
> > > +};
> >
> > Please do not copy bad naming choices from the Windows kernel into the Linux
> > kernel. Using names like WORD / DWORD / QWORD is much less readable than using
> > the numeric constants 2, 4, 8. Hence my proposal to leave out the above enum
> > completely.
>
> Are you sure those do not come from the spec itself? It's been a while
> since I last read it, but for some reason I remember those types of
> names being in there. But I might be confusing specs here.
Hello Greg,
That's a good question. However, a quick search on the Internet for the search
phrase "Universal Flash Storage" "qword" did not yield any results about UFS in
the first ten search hits. And I haven't found any references to the DWORD /
QWORD terminology in the "UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER INTERFACE
(UFSHCI), UNIFIED MEMORY EXTENSION, Version 1.1" document either. Maybe that
means that I was looking at the wrong document?
Thanks,
Bart.
