On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 08:04 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:03 AM, Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 2018-01-30 07:22 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > [...] >> > > [1:0:0:0] cd/dvd QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM 2.0. /dev/sr0 /dev/sg1 >> > > >> > > # readlink /sys/class/scsi_generic/sg0 >> > > >> > > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.1/ata1/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/scsi_generic/sg0 >> > > >> > > # cat /sys/class/scsi_generic/sg0/device/vendor >> > > ATA >> > >> > >> > ^^^^^ >> > That subsystem is the culprit IMO, most likely libata. >> > >> > Until you can show this test failing on something other than an >> > ATA disk, then I will treat this issue as closed. >> >> Hi Doug, >> >> Why is bug in ATA not a bug? Is it long unused by everybody? I've got >> it by running qemu with default flags... > > If the bug is in libata then it's not on Doug to fix it since he's only > maintaining sg. Then I think we need to CC ata maintainers rather than treat it as closed. +Tejun, linux-ide@, you can see full thread here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/syzkaller/9RNr9Gu0MyY
