Re: [PATCH] scsi: handle ABORTED_COMMAND on Fujitsu ETERNUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/18/2018 03:43 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Martin,
> 
>> You'd like to spend a precious BLIST bit for this single device which
>> uses vendor-specific ASC/Q?
> 
> I really don't want string comparisons in the regular code paths. Also
> not a fan of vendor-specific ASCs. But if you must use them, please add
> a flag and trigger on that.
> 
> Since this is a bit of an unusual check condition combo, we could
> entertain whether we should simply always ADD_TO_MLQUEUE on
> 0xb/0xc1/0x1. I wonder what would break?
> 
That's the usual problem I have with vendor-specific sense codes.
In general the risk is quite low of different vendors actually using the
same code; I guess we can get away with just adding a debug message here
and enable it without any vendor check.
Then we can reconsider the whole thing once we notice several vendors
using the same sense codes.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux